West Virginia Board of Medicine Licensee Detail

Data for licensees and disciplinary cases prior to 1998 may be incomplete. Please contact the Board of Medicine if further information is required.

Printer Friendly

Search Results:	Licensee Detailed Information
Full Name:	SCOTT ALAN NAEGELE, M.D.
Born:	1964
Preferred Mailing Address:	830 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE SUITE 108 CHARLESTON, WV 25302
Primary Work Location:	830 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE SUITE 108 CHARLESTON, WV 25302 (KANAWHA CO.)
Permanent License:	PERMANENT MEDICAL  # 17050  ACTIVE
Originally Granted:	9/14/1992
Next Expires:	6/30/2015
Drug Dispensing Certificate:	# 01654  ACTIVE
Originally Granted:	7/1/1995
Next Expires:	6/30/2015
Also Licensed Or Has Been Licensed In:	KENTUCKY   OHIO   WEST VIRGINIA
Medical School:	MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA, RICHMOND, VA (05/19/1990)
Post-Graduate Training:	WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON DIVISION, WV (06/30/1992)
Primary Specialty (Self-Designated):	OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Secondary Specialty (Self-Designated):	NO SECONDARY SPECIALTY ON FILE
PAs Currently Supervised:	NO CURRENT SUPERVISION

Disciplinary Records for SCOTT ALAN NAEGELE

Disciplinary orders of the WV Board of Medicine may be accessed from the case records below. Adobe Reader is required to open and view the documents.

NO DISCIPLINARY CASES ON FILE.

Malpractice Records for SCOTT ALAN NAEGELE

Consumers should take the following factors into consideration when evaluating a physician's competence from malpractice data. A number of studies have been conducted to identify indicators of substandard care among physicians. There is no conclusive evidence that malpractice data correlates with professional competence. There are a variety of factors unrelated to professional competence or conduct which affect the likelihood that a physician will be the subject of a malpractice claim, such as, the physician's time in practice, the nature of the specialty, the types of patients treated, geographic location, etc. For example, certain medical specialties have a higher rate of malpractice claims because of a higher risk inherent to the field of practice. Settlements of malpractice cases by insurance companies are sometimes handled as business decisions. In the case of some minor claims, it is less expensive for the insurance company to make a monetary settlement than it is for them to take the case to court. Many times such cases are settled without a finding of fault or admission of guilt on the part of the physician. A payment in settlement of a medical malpractice action or claim should not be construed as creating a presumption that medical malpractice has occurred.
Malpractice Record:	Case Detail
Action Type:	Settlement
Loss Date:	4/27/1995
Action Date:	6/3/1997
Amount:	$25,000
Insurance Company:	SPHERE-DRAKE INS
File Number:	496-11554
Notes:	PHYSICIAN REPORTED--1997
Malpractice Record:	Case Detail
Action Type:	Settlement
Loss Date:	12/17/1996
Action Date:	3/1/2001
Amount:	$44,000
Insurance Company:	MARKET FINDERS
File Number:	NO FILE NUMBER LISTED
Notes:	PHYSICIAN REPORTED ON 2001 RENEWAL
Malpractice Record:	Case Detail
Action Type:	Settlement
Loss Date:	2/28/2001
Action Date:	2/3/2004
Amount:	$150,000
Insurance Company:	NCRIC
File Number:	NO FILE NUMBER LISTED
Notes:	PHYSICIAN REPORTED ON 2005 RENEWAL